Post by firoj2525 on Mar 9, 2024 4:24:46 GMT
Interested parties, it is noteworthy that it is not commonly used by inspectors. Finally, the last point, which follows from the previous ones, refers to the existence of specific procedures so that the evasion of trade defense measures is contained. In customs-tax cases in general, the finding that there was some type of fraud on the part of the importer with the purpose of avoiding payment of the tax or submission to specific administrative treatment would be enough to trigger the assessment of a fine and the collection of amounts owed. On the other hand, in the case of commercial defense, identifying the fraud alone may not be sufficient to the collection of duties in the specific case.
To illustrate the situation, it is worth using the example of triangulation. This practice normally occurs through the diversion of goods through a third country before arriving at their destination, as a way of their real origin. In some cases, small procedures that do not constitute industrialization and do not change the nature of the merchandise can be used to avoid suspicion, such as assembly EL Salvador Mobile Number List portioning or packaging. This situation characterizes the so-called circumvention and, even though it is an elusive practice to be combatted, it will only give rise to the application of rights after the investigating authority carries out a specific procedure called an anti-circumvention review and the recommendation to extend the application of the measure to imports from the third country be accepted and published by Camex.
One of the known cases of circumvention that occurred in Brazil concerns imports of synthetic fiber blankets. After the imposition of anti-dumping measures on blankets imported from China in 2010, it was identified that producers began to carry out triangulation via Paraguay and Uruguay, where the products underwent marginal processing, just to try to avoid suspicions regarding their origin. In view of the verification and investigation of the elusive practice, the anti-dumping duties in force on imports from China were extended to imports from these two new countries through a specific decision published in by Camex . Another famous case concerns imports of flat rolled iron or non-alloy steel from China. After the publication of antidumping duties in 2013, exporters began to make small changes to the product with the aim of escaping the scope of the current measure and avoiding the collection of duties on imports from Brazil.
To illustrate the situation, it is worth using the example of triangulation. This practice normally occurs through the diversion of goods through a third country before arriving at their destination, as a way of their real origin. In some cases, small procedures that do not constitute industrialization and do not change the nature of the merchandise can be used to avoid suspicion, such as assembly EL Salvador Mobile Number List portioning or packaging. This situation characterizes the so-called circumvention and, even though it is an elusive practice to be combatted, it will only give rise to the application of rights after the investigating authority carries out a specific procedure called an anti-circumvention review and the recommendation to extend the application of the measure to imports from the third country be accepted and published by Camex.
One of the known cases of circumvention that occurred in Brazil concerns imports of synthetic fiber blankets. After the imposition of anti-dumping measures on blankets imported from China in 2010, it was identified that producers began to carry out triangulation via Paraguay and Uruguay, where the products underwent marginal processing, just to try to avoid suspicions regarding their origin. In view of the verification and investigation of the elusive practice, the anti-dumping duties in force on imports from China were extended to imports from these two new countries through a specific decision published in by Camex . Another famous case concerns imports of flat rolled iron or non-alloy steel from China. After the publication of antidumping duties in 2013, exporters began to make small changes to the product with the aim of escaping the scope of the current measure and avoiding the collection of duties on imports from Brazil.